Zeal
Nehemiah was a very zealous man for Jerusalem in a way that can be referred to now as patriotic. News of the pedicament of the city bothered him so much, he took it upon himself to implement change and redress the situation. He did so much in zeal -
1. Canvas the prominent ruler of his time for favour with regards to Jerusalem.
2. Mobilise and organise people to return to Jerusalem with him from Babylon - these also helped retrieve essential building material (timber) needed for the work of restoration in Jerusalem. No mean feat if we consider the different scenarios that could have arisen in transit and not explicitly mentioned in the text of the book of Nehemiah.
3. Put up with local opposition when he reached Jerusalem, particularly from 3 influential rulers at the time.
4. Formed a strategy to carry out the restoration work and led the team to do the work, he was also creative throughout and averted confrontation/accusation while outwitting opponents against his work.
5. Resolved amicably socio-economic problems that threathened the completion of his work partly with regards to slavery and also wealth assignment. He even deprived himself of his entitlement as a govenor for 12 years to this done.
6. Worked to implement reforms for communal living through persuasion, comfort, legislation and promugation of the Word.
Without doubt Nehemiah was a highly successful and skilled man - Ezra faced strong opposition to a similar work he attempted to perform (rebuild the temple) and was inhibited but not so Nehemiah. Nehemiah demonstrated great zeal, leadership & organisation skills in rebuilding the wall of Jerusalem.
Nehemiah did alot based on his abilities - he put much of what he had into service of God. He did alot without an explicit mandate/ directive to do what he did - there's is no record of God speaking directly to Nehemiah in the book of Nehemiah.
But Nehemiah was undeterred and he worked consistently for a long time. There was however another man from a different generation to Nehemiah - he also was zealous but he acted differently to Nehemiah.
Daniel prayed often and committed issues to God - Daniel received mandates and directives from God after he started praying (not before) that concerned not just the present time but also the future. Daniel possessed an excellent spirit and could have added value by expending himself but prayed instead.
Both lives serve as a comparism for choice of decision - which is better? To pray or act in zeal?? Who left a more lasting legacy??
1. Canvas the prominent ruler of his time for favour with regards to Jerusalem.
2. Mobilise and organise people to return to Jerusalem with him from Babylon - these also helped retrieve essential building material (timber) needed for the work of restoration in Jerusalem. No mean feat if we consider the different scenarios that could have arisen in transit and not explicitly mentioned in the text of the book of Nehemiah.
3. Put up with local opposition when he reached Jerusalem, particularly from 3 influential rulers at the time.
4. Formed a strategy to carry out the restoration work and led the team to do the work, he was also creative throughout and averted confrontation/accusation while outwitting opponents against his work.
5. Resolved amicably socio-economic problems that threathened the completion of his work partly with regards to slavery and also wealth assignment. He even deprived himself of his entitlement as a govenor for 12 years to this done.
6. Worked to implement reforms for communal living through persuasion, comfort, legislation and promugation of the Word.
Without doubt Nehemiah was a highly successful and skilled man - Ezra faced strong opposition to a similar work he attempted to perform (rebuild the temple) and was inhibited but not so Nehemiah. Nehemiah demonstrated great zeal, leadership & organisation skills in rebuilding the wall of Jerusalem.
Nehemiah did alot based on his abilities - he put much of what he had into service of God. He did alot without an explicit mandate/ directive to do what he did - there's is no record of God speaking directly to Nehemiah in the book of Nehemiah.
But Nehemiah was undeterred and he worked consistently for a long time. There was however another man from a different generation to Nehemiah - he also was zealous but he acted differently to Nehemiah.
Daniel prayed often and committed issues to God - Daniel received mandates and directives from God after he started praying (not before) that concerned not just the present time but also the future. Daniel possessed an excellent spirit and could have added value by expending himself but prayed instead.
Both lives serve as a comparism for choice of decision - which is better? To pray or act in zeal?? Who left a more lasting legacy??
Labels: Bible
